[Discuss] Unix date beyond 2057
Deryk Barker
dbarker at camosun.bc.ca
Fri Feb 29 09:47:45 PST 2008
Thus spake John Blomfield (jabfield at shaw.ca):
...
> > That is an illustration of Eric Raymond's point that there is no
> > conceivable
> > need for machines with word lengths larger than 64 bits so he predicts
> > the
> > current transition from 32-bit to 64-bit that is going on is probably the
> > last such transition for the human race. Normally, I pooh-pooh any such
> > conclusion about limits for computers because so many have been so wrong
> > about that before, but nevertheless, a 128-bit machine would have integer
> > ranges that are 2^{64} times larger than a current 64-bit machine, and it
> > really is hard to conceive of any practical software application that
> > would
> > overflow such a huge integer range.
> >
> Such a machine is probably of interest to groups involved with the
> mathematical modeling (numerical analysis) of complex physical systems
> e.g. weather forecasting, climate models, aerodynamic fluid flow etc.
> that are essentially solving initial value multi-dimensional
> differential equations, stepping forward into time. These models suffer
> from rounding errors and the difficulty of predicting the propagation of
> butterfly type events. In these cases the more precision i.e. the more
> bits per word the better. Having said that this is normally the realm
> of the big number crunching machines that are probably already 128 bit
> (I'm a bit out of touch these days) and not the PC world.
A quick persual of the Top500 list shows that the ost powerful achine
in the world (as of last November), the IBM BlueGene/L, is built from
212992 PowerPC 440 CPUs - a 32-bit chip. The system has 73728 GB of
RAM. I want one!
--
|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be understood|
|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened to. |
|email: dbarker at camosun.bc.ca | |
|phone: +1 250 370 4452 | Hermann Scherchen. |
More information about the Discuss
mailing list