[Discuss] NAT with real routable IP addresses?

David Bronaugh dbronaugh at linuxboxen.org
Mon Jun 18 15:54:41 PDT 2007


Johnny Stork wrote:
> I was hoping for a more informative and realistic reply. This is what 
> the client uses so I need to work with their existing equipment. Sure 
> I will be providing recommendations for cheaper, more secure and 
> powerful iptables/Linux based solutions, but for now I need to resolve 
> this particular issue. Also, a bit more explanation would be nice? Is 
> your suggestion (dont use ISA) based on the knowledge/experience that 
> there is a functional limitation in ISA which would prohibit this?
I can't speak to what MS ISA server will and will not do.

I believe the usual way to do this is not to use NAT at all, but instead 
to use standard routing with a firewall with a non-routable IP in the 
middle as a "border guard" if you will, disallowing undesirable traffic 
inside the walls.

IIRC this doesn't require 2 publically routable IPs -- simply a few 
static routes to work around the fact that the private IP in the middle 
is there.

David


More information about the Discuss mailing list